My Photo

Email me


Made with ImageChef

Google Content Search


Powered by Rollyo

Content Matters Community

Content Links

  • AlacraBlog
  • AlacraWiki
  • billtrippe.com
  • ContentBiz
  • E-Media Tidbits
  • eContent Magazine
  • InfoCommerce
  • ONLINE Insider
  • PaidContent.org
  • Research Recap
  • Seth Godin Blog
  • Shore Communications
  • That We Know
  • The Content Wrangler
  • Web Ink Now
Powered by TypePad

Content Industry Jobroll

  • Jobs from Indeed

Syndication and Reuse

  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

« June 2007 | Main | August 2007 »

July 31, 2007

Flip-flop: Denver Trust to Vote for Rupert?

DowjonesThe Wall Street Journal is reporting that the "Denver Trust" has changed their minds and decided to vote for News Corp's $60 per share offer for Dow Jones.

Reports indicate that the Trust, which had been holding out for preferred terms, was swayed to accept the terms once the Dow Jones board decided to create a fund to pay the legal and banking expenses incurred by the Bancrofts.  My guess is that seeing the stock slide back to $52 yesterday with no better offer forthcoming also influenced their decision.  Had the deal collapsed, the stock would likely trade back down to the $30s and the family would be left with nothing but infighting and ugly lawsuits.

According to the Journal, the votes from at least part of the Denver Trust will provide at least 38% of the family's shares in favor of the deal, which when combined with public shares, should be enough to push Murdoch over the top.

UPDATE: It looks as though Murdoch is getting confident.  Here's a sneak preview of tomorrow's WSJ Front page :)

Wsj_page1

July 30, 2007

Just Say No: Bancrofts Decline News Corp Deal

Dowjones According to MarketWatch, the Bancroft Family have voted just 28% of the family shares in favor of the News Corp acquisition, short of the 30% threshold required to make the deal work.

Recent comments have Murdoch standing firm on his $60 per share offer, so it looks as though the deal may fall apart.

While this may provide a reprieve in terms of editorial integrity, it won't be all wine & roses at Dow Jones.  The offer has served as a wake-up call for the Company and we can expect to see belt tightening in the months to come.

Sun to release earnings via RSS

Sun Via the Newstex blog comes word that Sun has announced their earnings via RSS and the Internet 10 minutes before sending the press release out via PR Newswire.

While that may not sound significant on the surface, it's a major shift in how companies have been taught to comply with Reg FD.  This could begin to strike a major blow to the role that PR Newswire and BusinessWire have served as the intermediaries between companies and their audiences.  RSS enables companies to push content out to users directly, without the need for a middleman.

Clearly the news suits Newstex well.  Newstex, through its RSS aggregation service, can deliver corporate RSS feeds directly, while also providing feeds from PR Newswire and Businesswire.

The full details are available on the Newstex blog and that of Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz.



Will Pricey Debt Slow Private Equity?

The M&A business in the content industry has been booming in recent years, due in large part to the private equity market.  Private equity firms have found the sector attractive, due to technology drivers and low infrastructure costs.  According to DeSilva & Phillips, the 2006 total of 151 acquisitions with a value of $20.5 billion dwarfed the activity of the prior five years.

But will recent turmoil in the credit markets slow private equity investments?

A typical private equity investment is 50% funded by investment capital and 50% with debt.  The availability of cheap, easy credit has fueled private equity investments in recent years.  As debt becomes more expensive, the cost of doing these deals will be driven higher.

At the same time, some of the strategic investors may be sitting on the sidelines for unrelated reasons.  Reliable acquirers such as Thomson and Reuters may become net sellers rather than buyers, as they navigate regulatory approval of their own merger, while Dow Jones seems unlikely to make any big moves until their situation is settled.

So, does this mean an end to content industry M&A?  Hardly.  There’s still a lot of money sitting on the sidelines looking for deals.  Strong companies with solid growth will continue to see many suitors, albeit perhaps at not such frothy multiples, and most likely after a brief cooling off period.  But old-line companies with stagnant top lines will not garner the attention they’ve become used to, as the strip & flip model is not supported by the current economics.

July 28, 2007

Wikia's Open Source Push to Dethrone Google

WikiaSpeaking at O'Reilly's Open Source Convention on Friday, Jimmy Wales provided details on Wikia's plans to enter the search market.

Wales stated that "Internet search is broken".  His biggest complaint is the closed, proprietary nature of the Google algorithms.  Wikia has recently acquired the Grub web crawler technology from Look Smart and plans to combine that with open source search technologies Lucene and Nutch to develop a new open source search engine platform.  Grub is a distributed platform, which can leverage the idle computing power of all those who run it, in order to generate the search index.  In this manner, Wikia can, theoretically, develop a massive search application without the hardware requirements of Google.

Wales Wikia states four guiding principles on its web site:

  1. Transparency: Openness in how the systems and algorithms operate, both in the form of open source licenses and open content + APIs.
  2. Community: Everyone is able to contribute in some way (as individuals or entire organizations), strong social and community focus.
  3. Quality: Significantly improve the relevancy and accuracy of search results and the searching experience.
  4. Privacy: Must be protected, do not store or transmit any identifying data.

Wales envisions Wikia to leverage a human-assisted approach, much like Jason Calacanis' recent launch Mahalo, although it sounds like Wikia will use humans in a more limited capacity, for disambiguation of terms.  Jason's initial thoughts on Jimmy's entry into the human-assist search field can be found on his blog.

Never one to shy away from bold statements, Wales suggests that this open source search approach could "shift the power of balance from the search companies back to the publishers".

In my opinion, it's unlikely that anyone will knock Google off its perch in the near-term.  At the same time, the search experience, which had improved dramatically from 1995 - 2002 or so has really stagnated during the past five years, and you could argue that it's gotten worse due to shopping and spam sites and SEO.  New approaches, like those of Wiki and Mahalo, are certainly worth our support and attention.





July 27, 2007

What's in a Name? Business.com acquired for $345 million

Business_comWhen the annals of Internet history are written, somewhere just below the pets.com sock puppet will sit the $7.5 million purchase of the business.com domain name, by Earthlink founder Sky Dayton and then Disney Internet head Jake Winebaum.  At the time, it was decried as clear evidence of the bubble.

Sock_puppet_2 Now, nearly eight years later, yellow page publisher RH Donnelley has acquired Business.com for $345 million.  According to PaidContent, other bidders included the NY Times, Interactive Corp, Dow Jones and News Corp.

The acquisition brings more than just the domain name this time.  Business.com has evolved into a b2b directory,  vertical search engine and ppc ad network.  The Donnelley press release projects business.com revenue of $50m for 2007.

While it seems pricey, the move makes sense for Donnelley.  It and other yellow page providers have failed to demonstrate the ability to generate significant online revenues.  Their extensive sales force, accustomed to selling simple bold listings and display advertising to small retailers, are ill-equipped to sell PPC or PPA models.  While this acquisition will hardly be enough to fix their business, it will bring new thinking, as Jake Winebaum will be CEO of the online business.

July 26, 2007

Happy Anniversary Alacra

Alacra_logoAlacra reached its eleventh anniversary this summer, and celebrated this week in typical Alacra fashion.

Eleven years is a long-time in the life of a startup.  A typical startup fails to survive 2-3 years.  Those that make it to that level often take the quick payout in the form of an acquisition, long before the company establishes itself and sees its vision through.  I'm appreciative of the Alacra management and board, whose patience have enabled the Company to grow steadily over the years.
Img_0590
   

July 24, 2007

AOL Acquires Behavioral Ad Network Tacoda

Tacoda_2 AOL has announced the acquisition of Tacoda, the behavioral ad network.

Tacoda has been an early leader in serving up relevant ads based upon a user's habits.  For example, someone who has recently been researching automobiles might see a car ad pop up on their screen, regardless of what site they are visiting.

The Tacoda acquisition is the latest in a string of ad network deals.  Google kicked it off by acquiring DoubleClick, while Yahoo responded by snagging Right Media, while Microsoft nabbed aQuantive.  Just a few weeks ago, Yahoo announced the release of SmartAds, which target users based upon a combination of behavioral, demographic and geographic attributes.  These efforts might have convinced Tacoda that going it along might no longer be an option.

According to John Battelle's Searchblog, the deal is rumored to be for $275 million.

UPDATE: Brad Burnham, of Union Square Ventures (an early investor in Tacoda) has posted his thoughts on the Tacoda deal. 

July 22, 2007

Can Business Users Get Value from Facebook?

Twitterwilson_2
Can business users get value from Facebook?

That's a question that I've seen & heard from a number of sources in recent weeks.  As Fred Wilson twittered this morning, its the same question he had about LinkedIn in the early days, but now gets value from it. 

So, what does Facebook have to do to create value for business users?  Here are a few thoughts:

Facebook_friend First, it needs to provide the tools to support business relationships.  Today, the only business relationship they support is "worked together" (or I guess "hooked up" may apply to the workplace, but I'm not going to go there).  Business relationships can be much more complex.  We should be able to reflect relationships like client:vendor, investor:portfolio company, biz dev partners and more.

Next, Facebook should allow its users to set a sharing threshold of "friendship".  There may be details that I'd share with "friends" but not with business colleagues.  I'd like the ability, when I add a friend, to categorize them as a friend, a colleague or an acquaintance.  Then, when I add apps to my profile, I'd like to flag them to whether they'll be shared with each category of friends.  That helps me separate business apps from personal apps, while still keeping them all in one place.

Once a framework like this is put in place, it will support business applications.  It would be simple, for example, to provide "degree of separation" relationships like LinkedIn offers. 

So, why do we need to build that in Facebook, if LinkedIn already offers it?

Facebook provides things that LinkedIn cannot easily match.  With the open platform, it's reasonable to expect industry-specific networking applications to emerge.  There are attributes of relationships which differ from industry to industry.  For example, a lobbyist might want to have a party attached to each of her contacts.  Horizontal apps could also be easily built for recruitment, reference checking, business development and more.

As a platform, Facebook is well-suited to replace the "home pages" most people use today such as my.yahoo.  I can pop an RSS reader into Facebook, so I can read all of my RSS feeds off that page.  I can integrate a calendar and address book (which should be able to synch with my corporate (Exchange) files and my Blackberry.  I can also access it from a mobile device, without having to fumble through sites that don't work well on the mobile. 

So, eight weeks after the platform was announced, it's clear that Facebook has not yet transformed itself into a business networking application.  But with a few enhancements to the core platform, and a bunch of creative developers using the platform, I'd bet it's there by next spring or summer.

July 20, 2007

Casting Call: Socialtext Seeks CEO

SocialtextRoss Mayfield posts on his blog that Socialtext is seeking to hire a new CEO (or, CEO 2.0, as he calls it).  Mayfield intends to stay on as Chairman and President.

It's an open call and Ross has posted details on his blog.  If you're a driven business leader with experience in the software market, you might want to check it out.

July 19, 2007

Identity Resolution for Anti-Money Laundering

Id_resolution Identity resolution technologies are used in various industries to help match people across multiple databases.  Initially deployed in the government / intelligence space, identity resolution has migrated to the retail market for fraud detection and even for cleaning CRM databases.  Various approaches are used, but the goal is to leverage available information to identify possible matches while minimizing false positives.

Certain fields present greater challenges for identity resolution.  One such market is anti-money laundering.
Financial institutions are required to follow "know-your-customer" regulations in order to comply with anti-money laundering and terrorist financing rules.  But while credit card companies get detailed addresses, date-of-birth and social security numbers from their applicants, terrorist watch lists have no such data.  Typically, it's just a name and, perhaps, a country.

Alacra has recently been working with Infoglide Software, a leader in the identity resolution space, to determine how to best apply these capabilities to the AML industry.  They've asked me to share some thoughts on the challenge, which they have posted to their Identity Resolution Daily blog.

July 17, 2007

Answers.com to acquire Dictionary.com

Answers_comVia PaidContent comes news that Answers.com has reached preliminary agreement to acquire Lexico Publishing, parent of Dictionary.com, Thesaurus.com and Reference.com for $100 million.

From a content standpoint, the deal makes a lot of sense.  Answers.com is effective at converting traffic to ad revenue and the acquisition would double its monthly page views.  According to its press release, the combined entity would rank 28th in comScore's rankings of U.S. sites.  Similarly, the combined company would rank second only to Wikipedia in terms of reference information sites, according to Hitwise statistics.

The price of $100 million would be roughly 14x 2007 revenues of $7 million and 35x earnings of $2.8 million.

As Staci points out, the deal would require Answers.com to raise substantial funds, likely through an additional stock offering, diluting the value of current shares.




July 16, 2007

Content Industry Group on Facebook

Facebook This week I created a Content Industry group on Facebook.  My goal is to provide a forum for business networking as well as a venue for sharing information.

Facebook users, just click here to join.  If you don't have a Facebook account, take a minute to create one then join.

July 13, 2007

Monetizing Facebook Apps

Money In the past week I’ve gotten a handful of questions (both in the comments here and face-to-face) about how Facebook applications will be monetized.  I’ll provide some initial thoughts here and welcome your comments.

Facebook_ra First, we need to acknowledge that it’s early in the process.  The Facebook API was launched May 25 – exactly seven weeks ago today.  So, while there are some fairly obvious methods of monetizing Facebook traffic today, we can be sure that more interesting models will emerge in the months to come.

The second acknowledgement is that Facebook is a platform; it does not come with a built-in monetization mechanism.  Let’s remember how long it took before Google monetized its traffic, and then again before it provided the mechanisms (via AdSense) for others to do the same.

What the Facebook platform does provide is a distribution vehicle, enabling you access to a rapidly growing addressable market that already exceeds 24 million users.  The platform also lends itself well to two well-established Internet monetization methods: advertising and eCommerce.

  • Advertising: While other social networks have restricted the ability for 3rd party developers to run ads on their “widgets”, Facebook places no such restrictions.  So, the most obvious method of monetizing a Facebook app is through development of an app that generates a lot of traffic and can serve ads.  This model should work for traditional media businesses.
  • ECommerce: The second method for generating revenue is through eCommerce.  Today’s top Facebook app is iLike.  iLike is a simple application that allows users to indicate their favorite music.  iLike is positioned as a music discovery service in the same vein as Last.fm or Pandora.    The iLike app for Facebook includes a link next to each song title, allowing users to buy that song, generating eCommerce transactions.  They also have a concert tour module where you can see which performers are on tour, then purchase tickets.  Developers could easily leverage existing affiliate marketing platforms (such as Amazon) to monetize traffic for books, movies or any other products.

So, is Facebook a cash machine for developers?  Hardly.  Building a business on the Facebook platform requires development of a compelling application that remains useful to the user over time.  It will require tapping into viral markets, but also providing underlying marketing and PR to drive usage.  The Field of Dreams approach will not work in this competitive landscape.

It’s also important to understand that generating traffic on Facebook is slightly different than that on other social networks.  Most social network apps get viral by having users post a widget to their page, then having other users interact with it.  As Lance Tokuda, CEO of RockYou points out in this VentureBeat article,

“...the viral loops for Facebook (there are several) revolve around the news feed, the mini feed and the invite request.  Not around people coming to your page and interacting with it.”

Ilike_2 Meanwhile, Lightspeed Venture Partners' Jeremy Liew provides a better sense of how Facebook apps are valued.  To Jeremy, there are four metrics that will determine the value of a Facebook app:
1. RPM (revenue per thousand page views (technically iframe views)).  This metric captures the revenue, whether it’s driven by a CPM, CPC or CPA (cost-per-action) model.
2. Page views per  user per month: many apps don’t generate many pageviews, as they simply display in a single iframe (such as a daily horoscope).  Those that generate interaction with multiple pages will have higher value.
3. Monthly churn: the stickier the app, the more likely it will be retained over time.
4. Virality of the app (as described in the Lance Tokuda interview).

I also see opportunities to make money in serving the emerging Facebook ecosystem.  In the first few weeks since the platform was announced, more than a thousand apps have been launched and tens of thousands of developer keys have been distributed by Facebook.  As more and more apps emerge, there’s a need for a more comprehensive directory for users to find the apps they need.  The existing “Top 10” list and broad categories are OK for starters, but they will always be dominated by large consumer apps.  There’s a tremendous opportunity for someone to launch a more navigable app directory that connects users with the more specialized apps they require.

Of course, there will be companies who specialize in app development (as already exist for developing MySpace widgets) and for marketing of your apps, just as the SEO/SEM market has emerged around Google.

So what’s the best way to monetize Facebook?  I think that Charlie O’Donnell says it best.

“It shouldn't be up to Facebook to figure out your business model”. 

The Facebook platform can dramatically shorten time-to-market of new applications, and help drive traffic.  But, it’s up to us to develop the applications and supporting business models to turn it into a business.

July 11, 2007

Finding Recruiters and Consultants in the Content Industry

AlacralogosmallAlacra launched the Alacra Wiki about two years ago.  The wiki provides detailed information on the companies, people and products that make up the business infromation and content industry.

Recently, Alacra added two new categories of content to the wiki: Recruiters and Consultants.  I get asked regularly for referrals in both of these areas.  Both segments are led by boutique firms, often sole practitioners, who have unique industry experience.  By adding these to the Alacra Wiki, it will make it easier to identify these niche providers (though I'm still happy to provide referrals to those who ask).

Alacrawiki1 The People section of the Alacra Wiki is a "who's who" of the content industry, profiling key leaders from all aspects of the media and publishing community.  If you're not listed on the Wiki (check here), all it takes is a minute to register and add your information.   Or, if you'd rather have Alacra add your details, just drop a note to and they'll post the info to the Wiki for you.

The Alacra Blog has more details on the new categories and the Alacra Wiki in general.

July 10, 2007

Seeding the Facebook Ecosystem

BaypartnersVia TechCrunch comes news of the next step in the emergence of Facebook: a VC fund offering seed investments only in companies developing Facebook apps.

Facebook_bg Valley VC Bay Partners has launched a new program called AppFactory, targeting developers of Facebook apps.  The investments will be small – typically in the $50k - $250k range, according to Bay partner Salil Deshpande, and is designed as a "fast-track" program with few investment hurdles.  Interested parties can find out all the details on the AppFactory FAQ.

While some will question the idea of betting on a platform that’s less than two months old, the concept has merit in my opinion.  By leveraging the Facebook platform, the time (and cost) to get to market is minimized.  And while it’s possible that Facebook is a fad, more and more serious players in the industry see it as the new dominant social media platform. 

The Facebook apps that have been launched to-date are little more than eye candy, allowing users to share their preferences (whether music, movies or political causes).  Of course, as Marc Andreesen points out in his “Five f__ weeks” post, the Facebook platform has been out for less than two months.  That’s not a lot of time to conceive and launch meaningful software.  He predicts that by September, when students go back to school and business people finish vacations, we’ll see strong adoption of a compelling group of Facebook apps.  Betting against Marc in the past has not been a rewarding endeavor, so I’m going along with him on this call.

July 09, 2007

John Blossom's Video Blog

John_blossomMany in the content business read John Blossom’s Content Blogger religiously.  The blog includes a daily recap of “must read” articles along with his own highly insightful takes on issues in the content industry.

A few weeks ago, John added a daily vlog to the mix – the ShoreViews Video blog.  While video blogging isn’t new, its use has been limited.  Video can be a compelling format.  In this case, it gives John the opportunity to get his personality into the posts.  Those who know John (or who have attended a content industry conference in recent years) know him to be smart and thoughtful with a somewhat wry sense of humor.  That personality doesn’t always translate in print, but on the video it comes through.

I had the chance to catch up with John last week to learn more about his experiences with video. 

Content Matters: John, you’re the first blogger in the content space to try video blogging.  What’s the response been so far?

John Blossom: Pretty good response so far, but it’s not yet clear to me that it’s a traffic builder.

CM: Which is faster for you to create, the video or written content?

JB: Overall, I think that writing is about as fast as video.  I can do most of the video in a single take but it takes a few minutes more to do the post-production work.

CM: How do you plan to integrate the video with the traditional text?  Are you planning to use audio for short posts, then expand in text?

JB: I did one video where I talk about some of the weblog posts.  I think that it works out pretty well that way, but it also works to talk about headlines that I wouldn’t necessarily write about, where some simple show-and-tell just works better.

CM: Any other thoughts for those who might consider video blogging?

JB: It’s a time-eater, but less so as I get the hang of the process.  I’m not sure whether I’ll continue to do a daily video.  I may switch to a weekly or event-driven format, such as for interviews.

CM: Thanks, John.  We’ll be watching the blog to see where you take it next.

Blossom_video My take: I think that vlogs are interesting, but I’m not yet convinced that they’re compelling in the business market.  In speaking with clients in the financial markets, they seem to have no appetite for video; it’s quicker to skim or to search text than to watch video, and the open and noisy trading floor environment is not quite a home theater setting.  I think that we’ll need to see improved video searching before Wall Street accepts video.  However, the corporate market is probably more ready for video today.  Meanwhile, entertaining video, such as that of Wallstrip or Rocketboom has already demonstrated the ability to attract an audience.  For those who have the time to experiment, I think it's smart to get out ahead of the technology and play with video now.

Those interested in seeing John’s vlog can find it on the Content Blogger site or on Robin Good’s MasterNewMedia site.

July 05, 2007

American Lawyer Media Acquired by Incisive Media

Alm American Lawyer Media ("ALM") has been acquired by UK's Incisive Media for $630 million.

ALM is the publisher of American Lawyer, National Law Journal and law.com, among other media properties.  ALM was previously owned by private equity firm Wasserstein & Co, which acquired the company in 1997.  While other publishers like West and Lexis focus on the research needs of the legal market, ALM is the leading provider of information about the business side of law.  ALM generated revenues of approximately $200 million in 2006.

Incisive, which is owned by private equity firm APAX Partners, purchased VNU's European trade publication business earlier this year and bought web marketing publisher ClickZ and Search Engine Strategies in 2005.  Incisive Media's revenues, $140 million in 2006, will more than double in the deal.

July 03, 2007

Yahoo Launches SmartAds Platform

Yahoo_logo This week, Yahoo announced the launch of a new graphical ad format it calls SmartAds.  SmartAds look to blend behavioral targeting with geographic and demographic information.

What's unique about SmartAds is the technology platform behind them, for which Yahoo has applied for a patent.  SmartAds are template-based, so that an advertiser can assemble, on-the-fly, a "custom" ad based upon the user.  Depending upon the ad, there could be thousands of combinations fed through the template, so each user will receive what appears to be a custom ad.

For example, a user browsing pages about hybrid vehicles, who has selected San Jose as their default city for Yahoo! weather might see a SmartAd for the Toyota Prius, along with links to dealers in the San Jose area.

Yahoo has done limited testing of SmartAds on their FareChase portal, reporting click-through rates of 2-3x that of non-targeted display ads.  They will now roll out SmartAds across all Yahoo properties, and will also deliver them through the Right Media platform once that acquisition is finalized.

Behavioral advertising is not new.  TACODA and Revenue Science offer behavioral ad placement today, while e-commerce sites like Amazon deploy similar capabilities within their site.  However, the combination of demographic plus behavioral, driven by this template-based system could give Yahoo an advantage, at least in the near-term.

One short-term challenge, as Scott Karp points out, is that there are no ad agencies today which are ready to deliver ad materials with this level of complexity.  That said, I think that Yahoo will hand-hold the early adopters here and if they can show success, the agencies will adapt.  Even more interesting might be whether the political campaigns look to use SmartAds to do targeted advertising.  While serving up the wrong ad could backfire, few businesses leverage demographic targeting the way the campaigns do.

While Google continues to dominate the search advertising market, Yahoo remains a key player in display advertising.  While that market has been flat recently, Yahoo's hoping that SmartAds can drive new growth through improved relevancy and higher click-throughs.

For more insights on Yahoo SmartAds, check these posts from SearchEngineLand and ClickZ.

RSS Feed

  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Bloglines

  • Add to netvibes

  • Add to Google

Subscribe to Content Matters via email


  • Enter your Email


    Powered by FeedBlitz

Barry's Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Premium Content

    • Premium Content from Alacrastore.com

    Facebook

    Research Topics

    Search the Alacra Store

    • Search For Business Information