My Photo

Email me


Made with ImageChef

Google Content Search


Powered by Rollyo

Content Matters Community

Content Links

  • AlacraBlog
  • AlacraWiki
  • billtrippe.com
  • ContentBiz
  • E-Media Tidbits
  • eContent Magazine
  • InfoCommerce
  • ONLINE Insider
  • PaidContent.org
  • Research Recap
  • Seth Godin Blog
  • Shore Communications
  • That We Know
  • The Content Wrangler
  • Web Ink Now
Powered by TypePad

Content Industry Jobroll

  • Jobs from Indeed

Syndication and Reuse

  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

« Alan Greenspan, Conrad Black and Shaggy | Main | Who Reads Those Footnotes, Anyway? »

December 18, 2007

Google Tiptoes onto Wikipedia's Turf

Last week, Google quietly put out the word about Google Knol, a new user-generated content site that enables "experts" to pen articles about topics they know.   There was no official press release, nor interviews with the media.  Just this short blog post.

Google is positioning Knol as the next logical step in their quest to organize all the world's knowledge.  Knols will be html pages that include information about a topic along with various links.  In that sense, they're similar to a Squidoo Lens or a Mahalo page.  The Knol platform will also include community aspects, so readers can rate a Knol or review it.

In order to motivate users to write Knols, they will also support advertising with the revenues shared by Google and the Knol author.

While Squidoo and Mahalo are the models that Google seems to be following, one can't help but think that it's Wikipedia who is the real focus of their attention.  Alexa ranks Wikipedia as the 8th most visited site, while it ranks Squidoo 714th and pegs Mahalo at 3,614.  Clearly, for it to move Google's needle, Knol will need to get Wikipedia-like traffic.

And that's where the controversy comes.  With Google controlling more than 80% of the search traffic these days, how will it determine the page rank of Knol pages?  Will Knol pages get a better rank than a comparable Mahalo or Squidoo page? 

TMCNet's Rich Tehrani sees the combination of Knols, Wikipedia and Answers.com listings dominating search rankings and squeezing out the little guy:

This move just means it will be that much more difficult for smaller players to show up on search results. Keep in mind these companies will be forced to buy more and more Google ads as this happens. So for Google this is truly a win/win scenario.

Meanwhile, Wired's Scott Gilbertson doesn't see a threat to Wikipedia, asking how users will know that the author of a Knol is truly an authoritative source:

Without that system of trust knols may still have value — only time will tell — but it isn’t likely to spell doom for Wikipedia.




TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/480703/24320590

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Google Tiptoes onto Wikipedia's Turf:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

RSS Feed

  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Bloglines

  • Add to netvibes

  • Add to Google

Subscribe to Content Matters via email


  • Enter your Email


    Powered by FeedBlitz

Barry's Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Premium Content

    • Premium Content from Alacrastore.com

    Facebook

    Research Topics

    Search the Alacra Store

    • Search For Business Information